Editor’s Note: Activist Post does not endorse
any candidate for president or any other political office. This
article is presented for informational purposes only and all
opinions are the author’s alone.
If only one voice is allowed to exist, then the only voice that
exists is basically a lie. —— Plato
The 2020 presidential election marks the first time in US
history that universal mail-in voting has been employed on such a
large scale. The propensity for fraud exists, but one side isn’t
currently acknowledging this possibility.
Regardless of what side of the aisle you find yourself
socially-distanced in, voter integrity should matter, given it
upholds a democratic process. Is democracy an illusion? Does hatred
for orange man trump voter integrity?
How about assuaging Americans’ concerns in a supposed
democratic country? Without voter integrity, we are just another
Banana Republic.
Please follow Maryam Henein on Twitter @maryamhenein
you can support her work on
https://www.patreon.com/maryamhenein
For the last three weeks since the election,
the president’s legal team has been receiving a deluge of
information regarding voter irregularities and potential fraud.
“Fake ballots. Back-dated ballots. Unobserved ballots.
Unsigned ballots. Mountains of them. From multiple states,” notes
legendary journalist
Jon Rappoport.
Of course, human errors and innocent mistakes do occur.
“Counting processes have all sorts of innocent errors, and
weirdness in data is well understood by anyone who has ever worked
with it,” writes
Revolver News, in an article on potential fraud in PA.
Machines can break. Data can get transcribed wrong. Code
updating websites, both for governments and data vendors, can be
faulty. Genuine ballots may be incorrectly classified as one type
or another during the counting process. Corrections of earlier
errors, even if well-intentioned, may be incorrectly assumed to be
additional errors.
But how about the other types of errors? Aside from benign
slip-ups, there are myriad reports of irregularities involving
mail-in voting throughout the nation, not to mention issues having
to do with the electronic voting machines used along with its
software.
Are Biden supporters correct when they say there is no credible
evidence, and that all assertions are conspiratorial,
unconstitutional, far-fetched, and flimsy?
“The existence of technical flaws does not establish that an
attack occurred, much less that it altered an election outcome,”
wrote a group of
scientists, including Matt Blaze McDevitt, Professor of
Computer Science and Law at Georgetown University. The signers of
the letter also stated that to their collective knowledge, “no
credible evidence has been put forth that supports a conclusion
that the 2020 election outcome in any state has been altered
through technical compromise.”
Okay. While we can hopefully agree that claims should be
supported by persuasive and verifiable evidence, going as far as to
say this has been the “most secure election in American
history” seems a bit of a stretch. At this point, I’d argue
it’s a red flag.
The official narrative insists the mere suggestion of any
wrongdoing is a crazy undemocratic conspiracy by Orange Man and his
followers. Why is the mainstream media engaged in gaslighting to a
degree fit for a nighttime soap opera, while social media platforms
censor non-cookie cutter voices? (While writing this piece, I was
locked out of my Twitter account for simply sharing an article that
links Dominion Voting Systems
with the CCP).
“It’s in everyone’s interest to have a full vetting of
election irregularities and fraud,” says attorney Rudy Guiliani,
who is part of President Trump’s legal team.
“The transparency of the elections is the cornerstone of our
Republic, and the allegations being made need to be investigated
for Americans to have confidence in this election and future
ones,” adds Trey Trainor,
Commissioner, and current Chairman Federal Election Commission
(FEC), an independent
regulatory agency charged with administering and enforcing the
federal campaign finance laws.
Every American should freely be able to ask questions about the
legitimacy of the election process, so it’s regrettable and
suspect that Big Tech has chosen the path of censorship, while the
mainstream is busy ignoring, projecting, dismissing, and
discarding. One statistician told me in confidence that he no
longer wishes to go on the record due to threats and
admonishment.
“What is going on in this country (in terms of election fraud)
is horrible & the censorship you (MSM/big tech) are imposing is
making it worse,” Rudy Giuliani said in a presser November 19th.
“The coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme
itself.”
Tired of the misguided efforts trying to distort reality?
What happens when both sides ask you the very same thing?
Where lies the truth?
After poring over hundreds of articles, reading affidavits
signed under perjury of law, lawsuits, conducting interviews,
reviewing this
crowdsourcing tool for journalists along with this
comprehensive document, and watching canvasser Zoom calls, I
can attest there is enough “evidence” to at the very least
entertain the possibility of irregularities on a massive scale.
In a recent commentary in The Epoch
Times, Newt Gingrich writes, “Stealing the 2020 election was
a mammoth undertaking, involving widespread lawlessness and illicit
partnerships between private actors and public officials.”
That’s quite a far cry from this election being Fort Knox
safe.
Before we take a deeper dive, please consider this is a fast
moving train.
In
Part One, we looked at an overview of potential election fraud.
In this follow-up, we delve in the media, Dominion, and the mania
involving mail-in voting. In future series, I will go over specific
allegations in the battle states of MI, PA, GA, and NV.
Incidentally, these swing states all used the Dominion Voting
Systems. These states are also where Trump has filed suits.
The Rona Regime, Mail-In Mania & Dominionizing The Vote
Let’s face it, we are in this veritable election mess due to
the Rona, which fueled the verve for mail-in voting. Except wait,
Rona is a psyop. Despite the mainstream media and COVID19 Task
Force’s narrative, the coronavirus is less fatal than the flu
with a 99.6% recovery rate. This is a casedemic made possible by
the non-diagnostic PCR
tool rife with false positives.
For a moment, consider this as truth against the backdrop of
hypocrisy, from not only leaders like Nancy Pelosi and their
non-masked behavior, but in our ability to go to Walmart but not
church. How can Democrats prematurely celebrate a Biden win when
they refused to go vote in person just three days earlier?
Coronavirus seemingly has carte blanche. Was the coronavirus
used to alter and eliminate laws put in place over the course of
decades to preserve the integrity of the ballot box?
Stumbling upon
hundreds and hundreds of filed lawsuits involving election
administration issues linked to the coronavirus outbreak supports
this possibility.
“There have been more lawsuits filed this year before the
election trying to change election rules than I’ve ever seen
before,” Hans von
Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation,
has said. “They’ve been trying to take advantage of COVID-19 to
get the changes they’ve wanted for years into election
rules.”
Trainer agrees. Covid has been the pretext for all the mail-in
voting, which is rife with potential fraud, he says. “On the
surface, ‘vote-by-mail’ sounds like a quick and easy way for
every registered voter to participate in our democracy. In reality,
it opens the U.S. to fraudulent elections on a massive scale that
will probably result in invalid results, contested elections, and
delays lasting weeks, if not months,” he wrote in an October Op
Ed titled
Vote by Mail: The Unintended Consequences.
Having practiced election law for almost two decades, served as
the general counsel for the Texas secretary of state, been involved
in statewide recounts in Florida, Michigan, and Texas, and
litigated numerous election contests, including one before the
Texas House of Representatives, I can unequivocally state that the
best way to make sure your vote counts in this election is to vote
in person.
“Certain Deep State democrats have been hard at work to weaken
laws that give way to voter fraud,” adds a Republican who
oversees a voter integrity non-profit. The man who wished to remain
anonymous says the main election firm behind these suits is Perkins
Coie, run by Marc Elias, the same firm that served as the
passthrough for the Steele Dossier. He adds that the Clinton
campaign has given Perkins Coie money. This is also the same law
firm that is now defending Dominion.
On their website, Perkins Coie features their ‘Four Pillars’
lawsuits promoting “safeguards that are necessary to prevent
voter disenfranchisement.” To learn more, check out Democracy
Docket, a platform run by Elias “for progressive advocacy and
information about voting rights, elections, redistricting and
democracy.
What is the conclusion when you factor in the modification of
election laws due to covid19, mail-in voter-related irregularities,
and vulnerabilities with the electronic Dominion Voting System?
The Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) ballot-counting system was
reportedly
used in 28 states during the election and contains Chinese-made
hardware components, as well as the Smartmatic ballot software.
(You can go to the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to see what states use
what voting machines.)
While Dominion says it is a
nonpartisan company, it has acknowledged connections with the
Clinton Global Initiative. Dominion’s first-ever lobbying
firm is Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. Nadeam Elshami,
Nancy Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on
the account. The company is based
out of Toronto, Canada, with its Sysctl servers reportedly
located overseas.
Given its foreign ties, can Trump’s Executive Order 13848,
“Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference
in a United States Election,” be used to legally call into
question this election?
“It’s a foreign company, no matter how you look at it, so
they’ve already violated the President’s order against foreign
interference in our elections,” Powell said in reference to
Dominion Voting Systems. “Our votes were actually eventually
counted in Barcelona, Spain or Frankfurt, Germany on foreign
servers.”
The mainstream media and the left are painting this as
conspiratorial. Yet foreign interference or not, electronic voting
also comes with its vulnerabilities.
The potential of abusing these machines is not new. Fourteen
years ago, Lou Dobbs covered a story for CNN titled Smartmatic Based in Venezuela Sold
to Sequoia, Top Officials Still in Venezuela, Before Sale to
Dominion. Why didn’t he mention this to Sidney Powell or his
thousands of viewers this month? Is this a recycled storyline that
banks on memory holes?
Cyber Security Analyst James Ramsland’s
affidavit explains that the Dominion Voting System has options
“to be an electronic paperless voting system with no permanent
record of the voter’s choices, paper ballot based systems, or a
hybrid of those two.”
“An update file didn’t properly synchronize the ballot
barcode generation and reading portions of the system. If that is
indeed the case, there is no reason to assume this would be an
isolated error,” reads the affidavit.
In a video, reportedly from 2017, Dominion Director Eric Coomer
(a man who has expressed his disdain for Trump and allegiance to
Antifa) demonstrates how
Dominion’s voting machines and software works. One feature,
he explains, is the ability to manually enter votes. A feature
Dominion calls “adjudication.”
Coomer says this feature is meant to be used when a voter
doesn’t mark the ballot correctly and the machine cannot read
which candidate was selected.
If this happens, an operator can “adjudicate”
the ballot. This means they manually select what candidate they
think the voter meant to choose.
Both Dominion and Smartmatic, its subsidiary, Sequoia Voting
Systems have
dismissed concerns over their systems. They refute all allegations
hinting at insecure voting processes. Smartmatic posted a tweet
this week, outright denying their transfer of technology to
Dominion voting systems.
Smartmatic may deny ties to Dominion Voting Systems, but in a
2015 interview about Smartmatic’s role in the Philippines
elections, Chairman Malloch-Brown admitted to a licensing agreement
with Dominion. Smartmatic was started in Caracas, but
disingenuously described as a Florida company with a small office
in Boca Raton.
Meanwhile,
Syctl (partnered with
Microsoft) also “strongly denies the fake news and maintains
they don’t provide any electronic voting machines to US
jurisdictions & do NOT tabulate, tally or count votes in US
elections.”
Syctl is a Barcelona based company that provides
many election products all over the world, including the United
States. They describe themselves as a “leader in digital voting
and electoral modernization.”
Americans who started scouring the internet for more information
about the link between these two companies attest they began
“scrubbing”
details that were once listed online. For instance, I can attest
that profiles from Dominion employees disappeared from LinkedIn.
As the
New Right Network writes, these companies
are interconnected through “name changes, acquisitions, shell
companies, and holding companies.” The true identity of most of
Smartmatic’s shareholders
remains a mystery.
In December 2007, Smartmatic announced the sale of their Sequoia
Voting Systems to Dominion Voting Systems. Sequoia is based out of
China.
Meanwhile, isn’t it odd that Cybersecurity and Infrastructure
Security Agency (CISA), a federal government agency part of the
Department of Homeland Security issued a
joint system along with Dominion. Who sits on CISA’s
“Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council?”
Microsoft. Dominion. Syctl. Smartmatic. Associated Press. Voting
Works. And More!
The council’s charter states that its primary mission is to
“advance the physical security, cybersecurity, and emergency
preparedness of the nation’s election infrastructure, in
accordance with existing U.S. law,” and that “this mission will
be accomplished through voluntary actions of the infrastructure
owners and operators represented in the Council.”
Do innocent companies create shell holdings and seemingly delete
information?
Read Part 1
HERE
Top image: Joshua
Woroniecki/Unsplash
Subscribe
to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send
resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on
SoMee,
HIVE,
