Pennsylvania

Federal Judge Dismisses Rudy Giuliani’s Lawsuit to Stop Pennsylvania’s Vote Certification

Federal Judge Dismisses Rudy Giuliani’s Lawsuit to Stop
Pennsylvania’s Vote Certification 1

(Headline USA) A federal judge issued a scathing order Saturday dismissing the Trump campaign’s futile effort to block the certification of votes in Pennsylvania.

His personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, stepped into a courtroom for the first time in decades to argue the case this past week.

U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote in his order that Trump had asked the court to disenfranchise almost 7 million voters.

“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann, an Obama appointee, wrote. “That has not happened.”

Brann ruled that Pennsylvania officials can certify election results that currently show Biden winning the state by more than 80,000 votes.

He said the Trump campaign presented “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations … unsupported by evidence.”

“In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state,” the opinion said. “Our people, laws, and institutions demand more.”

Trump tweeted after the ruling that he couldn’t understand why Biden was forming a Cabinet when the president’s investigators had found “hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes.”

Giuliani and a Trump campaign lawyer said in a statement that they welcomed the dismissal because it would allow them to appeal up to the U.S. Supreme Court faster, where Trump has repeatedly said he feels he has sympathetic justices.

But, the justices heard a case from the state before the election, over a three-day extension on mail-in ballots, and allowed the extension over the objections of the GOP.

Sen. Pat Toomey, a Pennsylvania Republican who had a hand in placing Brann on the bench during the Obama administration, said the ruling showed Trump had exhausted all possible legal avenues in the state and went on to congratulate Biden on his victory.

He called Brann “a longtime conservative Republican whom I know to be a fair and unbiased jurist.”

Giuliani repeatedly contended in court that it was illegal for counties to help people vote.

The Trump-aligned attorneys had argued that the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law was violated when Pennsylvania counties took different approaches to notifying voters before the election about technical problems with their submitted mail-in ballots.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press.

Read the Full Article

Pennsylvania
Texas Voter Says Level of Fraud Denial Is ‘Almost Comical’
California Enacts Nighttime Curfew From 10PM to 5AM to Fight the Virus

You might also like
Menu