Attorney Sidney Powell filed a
104-page lawsuit in Georgia alleging massive voter fraud in the
2020 election.
Sidney Powell’s lawsuit contained allegations of numerous
irregularities, anomalies, old fashioned “ballot stuffing,”
violations of Georgia’s Election Code, unlawful audit procedures
and use of voting machines to manipulate votes.
Many witnesses testified they saw ballots marked for President
Trump being put into Joe Biden piles and pre-printed “pristine”
ballots that went 100% for Joe Biden.
One affiant testified they saw “counterfeit” ballots with
darker colored watermarks that went 100% to Joe Biden.
When the Elections Director was alerted to the counterfeit
ballots they brushed off concerns and said the watermarks were
darker because of the use of different printers.
On
page 35 of Sidney Powell’s filing, the affiant testified
about “the use of different paper for ballots, that would
constitute fraud stating”:
I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for
Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots
had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the
ballot.
Another affiant (same witness who gave
sworn statement in Wood v. Raffensperger) explained she
observed batches of pristine ballots with different texture paper
with machine-stamped bubbles that went 98% for Joe Biden:
Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were
intended for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes.
There was a difference in the feel.These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood
out.In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed
that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were
unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my
estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted
votes for Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes
for President Donald J. Trump.”
The post
Georgia Lawsuit: Witness Testifies About Use of Different Paper For
‘Counterfeit’ Ballots, ‘Watermark Solid Grey Instead of
Transparent’ – 100% For Joe Biden appeared first on
The Gateway
Pundit.
