The Supreme Court in Wisconsin agreed to hear a case today that was thrown out by a Circuit Court Judge yesterday.
The hearing were today and one highlight was that not just one but two judges, who have such a limited understanding of the law and no reason for being on the court, claimed that the President’s post election litigation strategy was racist.
Advertisement – story continues below
Ongoing Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing on Trump election attack lawsuit: https://t.co/438EcmF8dZ
— Laura Walker ⚖🍸🇺🇸 🏴 (@LauraWalkerKC) December 12, 2020
Of course any judge calling the President’s actions to litigate an election that was wrought with fruad, is not acting in a racist manner:
…Seeking judicial review is not subversion of the Constitution or a call to rebellion. It is using the constitutional process. If going to the courts is “seditious,” going to church must be atheism…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 11, 2020
Advertisement – story continues below
One listener today thought the hearing was a sham:
Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing was a sham! The judges are arrogant and liberal hacks. Rebecca Dallet was all focused on saying this complaint should have been raised before election. 🙄 https://t.co/NTomLbNv7D
— President-Elect Okie Eleven (@OkieEleven) December 12, 2020
The President however has a strong case as we reported on December 3rd:
Advertisement – story continues below