By Sam Jacobs
Editor’s Note: Activist Post does not endorse
any candidate for president or any other political office. This
article is presented for informational purposes only and all
opinions are the author’s alone.
Regardless of where one falls politically, the sanctity of the
vote is a bedrock of a functioning representative democracy. Voters
have to believe their vote matters. And that the vote is free,
fair, and accurate.
The basic facts of the 2020 American Presidential election are
concerning because mounting evidence indicates there’s been a
concerted effort by state Democratic Parties to flip the election
from President Donald Trump to former Vice President Joe Biden in a
number of key swing states with the help of notoriously corrupt
Democratic Party machines in at least five American cities —
Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Pittsburg, and Atlanta.
Here are the basic facts of the case: On Election Night when
America went to bed, President Trump had a commanding lead in
virtually every swing state, as well as Virginia, which no one
expected him to win. However, when America woke up the next day, we
found that he’d lost these leads, largely on the basis of mail-in
ballots found in the middle of the night and out from under the
watchful eye of legal election monitors.
What’s more, these massive caches of votes – almost all of
which were for former Vice President Biden – came via large dumps
primarily from the five aforementioned cities in states
predominantly run by Democratic governors.
When one looks at the statistical likelihood of the reported
turnout, the numbers are so improbable they’re more at home in a
one-party state like�Saddam
Husseinâ€™s Iraq or North Korea.
Whatâ€™s more, Bidenâ€™s victory does not square with the
results of the Republican Party nationally: Republicans
won 28 of 29 competitive House seats and Democrats were unable to
flip a single state legislature. Joe Biden secured a
of the so-called â€œBellwether Districtsâ€ that almost always
choose the winner, one of which was in Delaware. Judicial Watch
counties in 29 different states who had higher than 100 percent
Anecdotally, swing states tend to follow Florida in
terms of swinging left or right. This is particularly true in
Michigan, which has voted in lockstep with Florida since 1968.
Nearly three dozen states had counting machines connected
to the Internet during the election, which is inherently
insecure. Joe Bidenâ€™s lead among mail-in ballots was massive in
two states â€” Michigan and Pennsylvania â€” while it was in the
single digits in most states.
Evidence of chicanery, irregularities, and outright manipulation
have poured in from a variety of states â€” Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, North
Carolina, Texas, New
This evidence could easily be dismissed as simply weird if one is
being generous or naive.
While much of this took place at the state level, there are also
irregularities that are occurring across state lines and these are
worthy of consideration. Itâ€™s not evidence per se, but there was
a massive spike in the number of Google searches
for â€œelection fraud punishmentâ€ in swing states in the 30 days
leading up to the election.
Below we explore the details and the data of what happened
across the nation on Election Day, with flagrant and often sloppy
irregularities occurring from coast to coast. Elsewhere we explore
similar efforts in the key swing states of Pennsylvania,
All of the posts in this
series will be updated as more credible information is
The General Landscape of American Election Fraud
The media is trying to weave a narrative with ever-shifting
goalposts. They began by saying that not only did voter fraud not
happen, but that itâ€™s impossible. Now, they have shifted their
story to saying that there is always minor fraud, but that it never
really matters much.
The Heritage Foundation has identified 1,200
elections where voter fraud made the difference in recent
decades, long after the era of Jim Crow when election theft was
de rigueur. Of these, fully 15 were thrown out specifically because
cheating by mail-in ballot.
Another narrative in the controlled media is that illegal aliens
and other non-citizens donâ€™t vote. This is patently untrue. In
fact, they vote at alarmingly high rates. A 2019 study found that
approximately 2.2 percent of respondents admitted to voting
illegally, which implies a little under
a million ballots cast by non-citizens every year.
The counterargument is that respondents are either lying or
misunderstood the question, but this is simply not true â€” those
who conducted the study
verified their votes.
So we can see that electoral fraud is not only impossible, it is
common. It is not negligible, it has determined elections in living
memory. With this as our backdrop, we will now investigate voter
irregularities throughout the nation during the 2020 Presidential
What Constitutes Evidence of Electoral Fraud?
Before going further, it is worth discussing what constitutes
evidence for electoral fraud. Well, the Carter Center has a set of
standards that they use to determine whether or not there has
been electoral fraud somewhere.
These are the standards used by globalists to determine whether
or not elections they disapprove of have been conducted
fraudulently. Several of them are present in the contested
- Counting procedures should be verifiable.
- Votes should be presented for independent review.
- Elections should be subject to recounts.
Additionally, the Carter Center states that it is the right of
dissidents to challenge and question the results of an election
that they believe to be fraudulent. Harassing dissidents is
considered evidence of chicanery in and of itself.
â€œEffective redressâ€ is the term they use and it is
considered by the Carter Center to be vital for establishing an
election as legitimate. The resistance of the Democratic Party to
recounts and audits should be a red flag in and of itself.
There are also mathematical anomalies that are worth looking
into because, regardless of turnout and outcome, elections will
follow certain patterns. One of these is that, because of mail
sorting, mail-in ballots will consistently show the same ratio of
support for each candidate.
We did not see that, however â€” there is a significant spike
in support for Biden and fall off in support for President Trump as
Election Night dragged on.
Indeed, in Wisconsin, this anomaly became massive around 4 a.m.,
the same time that the massive ballot drops without supervision
began. The same phenomenon occurred in Pennsylvania, Michigan and
Georgia, all four of these states with copious amounts of electoral
chicanery and irregularity. Virginia was another state with similar
is another area where we see mathematical irregularities. Put
simply: When we have large datasets of numbers, there is a pattern
we can find with regard to the final and penultimate digit of each
number in this data set.
Bidenâ€™s Vote Tallies
apparently Violate Benfordâ€™s Law, everyone else follow across the
country, except for Biden in key races. This is a test for catching
election fraud, used by the State Department and forensic
accountants. https://t.co/XbZtRQyxZuhttps://t.co/crK9HChfnW pic.twitter.com/mHNjStrB2Q
â€” Data Respecter (@DataElefantFan)
November 6, 2020
Benfordâ€™s Law analysis is one of the first things run by
forensic accountants looking for financial malfeasance or tax
Many of the electoral tallies in disputed states violate
Benfordâ€™s Law â€”
but only for Joe Biden, whose distribution more closely
resembles the curve when people type â€œrandomâ€ numbers in.
President Trump, Jo Jorgensen, Howie Hawkins, and Kanye Westâ€™s
numbers do not violate this law, but former Vice President
Bidenâ€™s do in disputed areas.
The Glitch From Coast to Coast
One recurring theme throughout the 2020 election is the glitch.
There have been a number of glitches, many detailed in our series
on irregularities in different states. This, in and of itself might
not be cause for concern â€” however, in every case, these
so-called â€œsoftware glitchesâ€ favor former Vice President Biden
at the expense of President Donald Trump.
Again, we have detailed these in our state series article, but
we will mention some here just to give you a general idea of what
has been going on with these â€œglitches.â€
One in Michigan sent
6,000 votes to Biden that were meant for Donald Trump. Another
in Wisconsin, robbed Donald Trump of
19,500 votes. Another similar glitch in
Georgia saw an unspecified number of votes go to Biden that
were, once again, meant for the President.
One Michigan county clerk
caught a glitch in tabulation software so they hand counted votes
and found the glitch caused 6,000 votes to go to Biden + Democrats
that were meant for Trump and Republicans. 47 MI counties used this
software. All must check now! pic.twitter.com/21AXyJZDZi
â€” Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck)
November 6, 2020
There appears to be a pattern here. Were these all bona fide
mistakes, we would likely find votes that were meant to go for Joe
Biden going to Donald Trump before the situation was corrected. But
we are unaware of any such error in favor of the President.
The common denominator? The voting software used to calculate
the vote made by a company with deep connections to the DNC.
The Turnout That Wasnâ€™t
The DNCâ€™s victory in the 2020 Presidential election relies
heavily upon a massively increased turnout, again centered around a
handful of large cities controlled by the Democratic Party. One
example of this is 90 percent turnout in the entire State
of Wisconsin, which would not only be the highest level of
turnout in American history, but also comes close to the 92 percent
average in Australia where voting is mandatory. In the city of
Milwaukee alone, the turnout was 84 percent.
Compare this turnout to Cleveland, a culturally comparable city
not in a swing state, which had a comparatively scant 51 percent
turnout. This is an important city to draw a contrast with because,
while it is a Democratic stronghold, as are most large cities, and
it has a similar minority population, it was not in a state that
was considered in play this election. Democrats attempted to steal
the election by fabricating astronomical turnout in urban areas
they control in swing states.
The turnout gambit becomes even more laughable when one
considers that Biden is one of the least invigorating Democratic
candidates since John Kerry or Mike Dukakis. Yet somehow this
candidate was able to increase his vote above what Barack Obama
enjoyed, with some districts in Milwaukee putting up
more votes than there are registered voters in the area.
A broad study conducted by
Judicial Watch found that 353 counties across 29 states had
turnout exceeding 100 percent of registered voters. Eight of these
had turnout exceeding 100 percent across the entire state: Alaska,
Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and
Perhaps more damning, the study was limited to 37 states
publishing their voter registration data. This means that, of the
37 states that Judicial Watch had access to, 78 percent of them had
turnout exceeding 100 percent.
Vetting of Mail-In Ballots
The American public was warned for months in advance that
mail-in balloting, illegal throughout most of Europe, is inherently
insecure and lends itself to the kind of mass voter fraud that we
are seeing in action right now.
But the mail-in ballots that we are seeing in this election are
not just nonspecifically â€œsuspect.â€ They are rife with
irregularities and a lack of accountability that should cause them
to be closely investigated, audited and, where appropriate, thrown
Mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania are particularly questionable.
This is a state where Biden enjoyed a
60.5 percent lead in mail-in voting. More damning is the fact
that many of these ballots seem to have arrived before they were
even sent, arrived the same day or arrived within one day of being
sent. This is an abnormal amount of processing time, especially
when we consider the surge in mail due to the election.
James Oâ€™Keefe found two whistleblowers at USPS, one of whom
was willing to come forward, who told of backdating ballots. This
intimidated by the feds and it was
falsely reported that he recanted his report.
Vetting of mail-in ballots is particularly important because
they are widely open to electoral fraud, as we have discussed
above. So it is troubling that we have multiple reports, including
in the form of
sworn affidavits presented before the court, of poll watchers being
thrown out, mocked, intimidated and even physically assaulted
during the course of counting mail-in ballots.
We have recordings of the
federal agents, who COERCED this man through a 4 hour interrogation
Without representation, who stands by his original affidavit re:
Standby for recordings doubling down on backdating ballots.
This is soviet style truth suppression https://t.co/toK6r8zb2m
â€” James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII)
November 10, 2020
Of special note is the strong resistance to poll workers in
swing states to allow anyone to watch them. In Pennsylvania, poll
workers were caught
on video expelling poll watchers despite knowledge of a court
order preventing them from doing so. Reports of expelled poll
watchers were part of the lawsuit filed in Michigan and there were
reports out of Georgia. This raises the obvious question â€”
why donâ€™t they want anyone watching them?
Biden Outperformed Obama
Bidenâ€™s turnout when compared with Barack Obama is another
area warranting special investigation. It is worth noting that
Biden was generally viewed as a less-than-ideal candidate in no
small part because he generated very little enthusiasm among
Democratic Party voters. In contrast, Obama was a rock star
candidate who had just defeated the partyâ€™s presumptive nominee
in a hard-fought primary. Biden, on the other hand, was largely
foisted on the party through back room deals in an attempt to
prevent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders from obtaining the
nomination for President.
Biden also barely campaigned throughout the primary season. Most
of the campaign was characterized by the candidate calling
â€œlids,â€ a term meaning that he was home for the day and would
be doing no more press, with the occasional teleconference. Not
only did he start with an unethusiastic base who would have
preferred nearly anyone else, he did little to motivate his base
throughout the course of the election.
Yet somehow, he outperformed Hillary
Clinton who won a hard-fought primary against Senator Sanders
and kept pace with numbers from Barack Obamaâ€™s
2008 and 2012
campaigns, being able to boast that he has received more
votes than any other candidate for President in American
history. In some cases â€” tellingly in areas crucial for
winning the election â€” Biden was able to outperform Barack
For example, in
Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery Counties in Pennsylvania, he
outperformed Obama by approximately 25 percent. In Montgomery
County, he was able to double Barack Obamaâ€™s margin of victory.
He increased the raw vote total there by fully 80,000 votes. The
population of this county only increased by 22,000 in the years
between Obamaâ€™s victory and Bidenâ€™s alleged one.
Not only should we be skeptical of the numbers, we should be
skeptical of them because of where they came in from. Such dubious
numbers were not coming in from places that we could assume were
Democratic Party strongholds like New
York, Chicago and Miami where Biden actually saw a decrease in
voters relative to Hillary Clinton. So why is he putting up these
high totals only in a handful of cities (Atlanta, Detroit,
Milwaukee, Philadelphia) controlled by Democrats in swing
Another area of suspicion are the Biden-only ballots. Tens or
hundreds of thousands of voters marked their ballots only for Joe
Biden, with presumably
no interest in down ballot races. While itâ€™s not unusual for
people to take an outsized interest in the Presidential election,
it is unusual for 450,000 people to have no interest in down ballot
races and for this to be concentrated in a handful of swing
The strange dichotomy here is that people were far more likely
to do this in alleged swing states
with competitive Senate races like Georgia, while deep red
states like Wyoming did not see a massive number of Biden-only
ballots. In Georgia, there was only
a difference of 818 votes between Trump and down ticket Senate
races. Biden, on the other hand, received over 95,000 more
votes than either Senate candidate on the ballot in Georgia. In
Wyoming there were a mere 725 more votes for Biden than the
Democratic Senate candidate in the state.
In Georgia 95,801 ballots only
voted for Biden and no other race. In Georgia 818 people only voted
for Trump and no other race. Forgive me if I find that very bizarre
â€” Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck)