Censorship

STOSSEL: ‘Facebook Said Its ‘Fact-Checks’ Used To Excuse Censorship Are Actually ‘Opinion”

STOSSEL: ‘Facebook Said Its ‘Fact-Checks’ Used To Excuse
Censorship Are Actually ‘Opinion” 1

Popular political commentator John Stossel wrote an op-ed for the New York Post in which he discussed a revelation discovered after he sued the company for defamation.

The libertarian-minded commentator has expressed his personal belief both in this article and in the past that “Facebook is a private company, so it can censor whomever it wants,” but has emphatically stated opposition to their usage of the “fact-check” mechanism. Stossel argued that such claims made by Facebook can be defamatory, as they make an authoritative statement of ‘objective fact’ that is often false in reality.

STOSSEL: ‘Facebook Said Its ‘Fact-Checks’ Used To Excuse
Censorship Are Actually ‘Opinion” 2

“Recently, I sued them because they defamed me,” Stossel wrote. “They, along with one of their “fact-checkers,” a group called Science Feedback, lied about me and continue to lie about me.”

Stossel then revealed that the social media network tried to skirt responsibility for the arguably slanderous statements by arguing in court that their “fact-checks” actually aren’t based on an objective metric at all.

“Amazingly, their lawyers now claim that Facebook’s “fact-checks” are merely “opinion” and therefore immune from defamation.

“That’s how Facebook portrays them on its website: ‘Each time a fact-checker rates a piece of content as false, Facebook significantly reduces the content’s distribution … We … apply a warning label that links to the fact-checker’s article, disproving the claim.’”

STOSSEL: ‘Facebook Said Its ‘Fact-Checks’ Used To Excuse
Censorship Are Actually ‘Opinion” 3

Later in the op-ed, Stossel discussed specific examples of Facebook’s crooked pro-censorship practices, pointing out that the social media company promoted a “fact-check” that lied about him, even going as far as to fabricate an entire quote.

How did Facebook defame me? 

I made a video that said that California’s wildfires were mostly caused by poor government management. Facebook censored that as “misleading.” They linked to a Science Feedback post that puts the following sentence in quotation marks, as if it were something I said: “Forest fires are caused by poor management. Not by climate change.” 

But I never said that! 

STOSSEL: ‘Facebook Said Its ‘Fact-Checks’ Used To Excuse
Censorship Are Actually ‘Opinion” 4

Facebook’s reviewers took that quotation from someone else. Or maybe they just made it up?

In my video, I acknowledge, “Climate change has made things worse!” I just argued that government mismanagement was a bigger factor. Climate change hit lots of forests, but well-managed forests fared much better.

Here’s where the ‘facts’ about me lie — Facebook bizarrely claims its ‘fact-checks’ are ‘opinion’

Stossel concluded by saying he hopes Facebook will one day realize that their path of censorship is not one to follow, especially in the sloppy and malicious manner they have engaged in thus far. He then left the viewers with some food for thought.

“The world needs more freedom to discuss things, not less.”

Support Big League Politics by making a donation today. You can also donate via PayPalVenmo or donate crypto. Your support helps us take on the powerful and report the truth that the mainstream media wants to silence. 

Read the Full Article

Censorship
CORTES – Even CNN’s Polling Shows Energized 2022 Voters Are Split on Whether 2020 Was Stolen.
The US Post Office Worked on Project to Build and Test Secret Voting System Before the 2020 Election

You might also like
Menu