Three different writers published articles this week addressing
the December� 2020, “Consensus Study Report: An Assessment of
Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas
Embassies, Standing Committee to Advise the Department of State on
Unexplained Health Effects on U.S. Government Employees and Their
Families at Overseas Embassies, of the National Academies of
Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020)†[1]
First, writing from Norway, Einar Flydal offers
“Havana syndrome: The report on the irradiation of American
diplomats is an acceptance of the criticism of 5 G, which, among
other things, has come through appeals and recommendations from
professionals throughout the world.†Included in his analysis are
interview questions with 96-year-old Prof. Karl Hecht regarding the
microwaving of the Moscow Embassy during the Cold War.
“What does this summary tell us?
This is the question that Einar Flydal naturally asks. When
researchers trusted by the US leading research council are charged
with an impartial assessment and when these researchers come to the
same conclusion as those researchers who strongly criticize US
radiation protection administration, FCC and FDA, their
standardization body IEEE as well as ICNIRP, WHO’s handling and
therefore also our own radiation protection, it becomes an
acceptance of the criticism of 5G, which has, among other things,
been made via appeals and recommendations from professionals
throughout the world. (2)
Karl Hecht and “microwave warâ€
Prof. Dr. Karl Hecht (*) witnessed the “microwave warâ€
between the US and the USSR when the Soviet Union irradiated the US
embassy in Moscow for a total of 17 years – with doses well below
the US limit values. The following is what Karl Hecht answered
Einar Flydal to his inquiry:
In the years 1962-1979 there was a building of interception of
other countries’ embassies within each country. It was a war of
interception between the superpowers USA and the Soviet Union
(USSR). The US had its Moscow Embassy in Tshajkovskygade, and had a
1000 watts high frequency transmitter.
A high frequency transmitter with continuous vibrant waves was
placed on the side of the Soviets and a field force of 10 000 µW /
m2 aimed at the US Embassy. The exposure limit values in the US
were 100 000 000 µW / m2 and 000 100 µW / m2 in the USSR.
In 1976, 120 people at the US Embassy were told via Ambassador
Walter J. Stoessel that health damage caused by radiation from a
Soviet radio transmitter may have occurred.
Dr. Johnson, US Embassy doctor, found the following symptoms in
a wide range of US Embassy employees:
- mental stress
- sleep disorders
- inflammation of internal organs (b. ex. ulcer)
- potency disorders in men
First Dr. Johnson diagnosis “hypochondria†but corrected it
later. Dr. Johnson then investigated approximately 20 Western
embassies in Moscow, but found no pattern on these symptoms.
Additional medical finds at the US Embassy in Moscow staff after
they returned to the US: Approximately 40% had leukocytosis
(elevated white blood cells, signs of inflammation and the
like).
What endings can we make of this?
Electromagnetic radiation even with very weak field strength is
an imperceptible, yet both mentally and biologically very strong
stress factor, which over a long time has very severe health
harmful effects.
The Moscow signal clarifies what humanity has in store from the
radiation of the 5G system.
EMF field strength was 10 µW / m2 continuously around the
clock. It’s modest compared to what the telecommunications
industry and ignorant politicians are now proposing to put the
population through.
* Dr. Karl Hecht professor emeritus in experimental and clinical
pathological physiology at Humboldt University of Berlin. As a
doctor and researcher, he has warned strongly about the effect of 5
G radiation. Hecht is 96 years old and he impresses with his
thorough knowledge of the risk of non ionizing radiation. He led
the Pathological Institute of the Berlin Charité and the Institute
of Stress Research Berlin. He was a member of many committees in
Germany and the former Soviet Union, among other things. member of
the Russian Academy of Sciences, was an expert for radar soldiers
in their processes and author of the investigation for the Federal
Office of Telecommunications (1997) on the Russian research
results. This study showed full potential for damage to non
ionizing radiation. Prof. Hecht presented the results of this
study, which at that time was not allowed to be published following
a decision of the Federal Office, in 2001 in environmental-medical
communities.
See more here, where his studies can also be downloaded:
https://www.diagnose-funk.org/…/artikel/detail&newsid=1590
Read his article here:
https://einarflydal.com/2020/12/11/rapporten-om-bestralingen-av-usa-diplomatene-viser-bloffen-om-5g/
In the United States, Children’s Health Defense
researcher Pam Long wrote, “Report on ‘Havana
Syndrome’ Prompts Call for More Research Into Health Impact of
5G†Last month’s report on the illnesses of 50
American diplomats in Cuba and China stopped short of blaming
microwave weapons. But some experts say the technology is the only
plausible cause, and that the investigation could hold lessons
about the safety of 5G.’
Her hyperlinked article provides an overview of the embassy
injuries, an in-depth explanation of the Frey Effect, or microwave
hearing, and a look at the weaponizing of microwave technology,
concluding, “The lack of transparency around the recent attack
on U.S. diplomats with a weaponized form of this technology,
combined with the fact that hundreds of medical doctors have
requested a moratorium
on 5G RF technology until the negative health effects are
properly studied and evaluated, should give the general public
reason to reevaluate the unsubstantiated safety claims of 5G.â€
Read her article here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/havana-syndrome-more-research-health-impact-5g/
Finally, Patricia Burke wrote, “Embassy Diplomat
Injuries Most Likely Microwave Weapons; Goodbye To “Thermal –
Only†Claims For Non-Ionizing Harm†for Natural Blaze.
She notes that intelligence reports are implying that “the
Russians are to blame†for the injuries documented in embassy
personnel.
“Because injured diplomats were not reporting symptoms of burn
or thermal injury, but did exhibit brain injury, the
“thermal-only theory†ruling international wireless
telecommunications safety decisions, including assumptions about
next generation 5G, must be reassessed. Civilians worldwide are
reporting harm associated with increasing juxtapositions of
cumulative, chronic, and ubiquitous wireless exposures.
Intelligence reports and the mainstream media imply that the
Russians are to blame for the embassy attacks. If so, why are the
U.S. and other countries not urgently investigating reported harm
to civilians?†Patricia has become increasingly concerned with
the weaponized use of misleading hyperlinks in the mainstream
press, and, like Einar Flydal, provides footnotes.
Read the article here:
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2021/01/embassy-diplomat-injuries-most-likely-microwave-weapons-goodbye-to-thermal-only-claims-for-non-ionizing-harm.html
Coinciding with articles about “the Havana Syndrome†the
Washington Spectator published a major exposé by investigative
journalist Barbara Koeppel on industry influence into the science
and policy of 5G and wireless radiation. The Environmental Health
Trust notes,
Koeppel’s 7,000-word report features numerous US and
international scientists and experts discussing corporate power’s
influence on scientific discourse and reveals stunning ties between
global telecommunications companies and federal agencies.
Koeppel’s investigation follows the money. She details industry
ties between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), The Center for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the International Commission
on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, (ICNIRP), The New York Times,
the American Cancer Society, and scientists professing that 5G is
safe. Koeppel presents the research of EHT president Devra Davis
PhD, MPH and Om Gandhi Sc.D., Electrical Engineering, on
children’s unique vulnerability to wireless radiation. She also
cites the investigation by EHT into the CDC’s website pages on
wearables and non-ionizing radiation, which found that several
pages were drafted in consultation with an industry-tied
consultant.â€
Koeppel’s investigation, which includes The New York Times,
highlights how and why concerns like those voiced by the three
Havana writers are not being reported by the mainstream media.
Karen Churchill, writing from the UK for Stop 5G International,
chronicled her experience of being censored, not by one of the
large social media companies, but by a popular on-line Liberal
Democrat political forum, mirroring concerns in the U.S. and
elsewhere that the differing political parties, as well as
environmental groups, have not been ready, willing, or able to
address the implications of increasing radio frequency exposures,
including 5G.
Clearly, from this flurry of reporting, one can see there is
massive media and political pressure to prevent considering health
risks in discussions and rulings of 5G. Due to the exponential
increase in radiation that 5G will bring about, it is imperative
that factual information be disseminated widely, and not be
censored. The question arises, how can we break through this level
of cognitive dissonance to make way for long overdue, open-minded
and informed discussion and actions?
Notes:
[1]https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25889/an-assessment-of-illness-in-us-government-employees-and-their-families-at-overseas-embassies
Patricia Burke works with activists across the country and
internationally calling for new biologically-based microwave radio
frequency exposure limits. She is based in Massachusetts and can be
reached at [email protected].
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace,
and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and
freedom HERE!
Follow us on Telegram,
SoMee,
HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter and Gab.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming!
Get a free issue of Counter
Markets today.
