Six states, led by California’s fulltime climate alarmists, this week enacted a ban on the sales of high-end gaming computers.
Niche Gamer reports that Dell is already following the 2017 law that just went into effect. According to the gamer-focused site, Dell has “pulled the sale of seven of its eight Alienware gaming desktops” from California, Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.
Trying to order one of the banned machines will alert buyers, “This product cannot be shipped to the states of California, Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Vermont or Washington due to power consumption regulations adopted by those states. Any orders placed that are bound for those states will be canceled.”
The offending component would seem to be the power-hungry NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 graphics card, but it’s no problem to order the card separately and install it yourself. I tried ordering one from Amazon without any hassle.
Gamers, you might have guessed, aren’t happy.
Did more research on California’s pc ban. Too much clickbait..
Pre-built pcs seem affected but you can build your own just fine if I’m not mistaken.
Pretty retarded cause pc gaming is nearly as bad as the fucking megacorps ass blasting the environment magnitudes more.
— Mutahar (@OrdinaryGamers) July 28, 2021
Since gamers typically love customizing or even building their own gaming machines, the six-state ban seems somewhat unlikely (cough, cough) to have much effect on the power consumed by gamers.
It’s true that graphics cards like NVIDIA’s 3070 consume a lot of power — up to 220 watts, plus whatever the rest of the PC’s components and monitor require. However, a Sony PlayStation 5 console draws not much less at 200 watts, but the California law (and its copycats in those five other states) places no restrictions on console sales.
A 2019 report from the California Energy Commission notes that “computer gaming in California consumed 4.1 terawatt-hours/year in 2016,” but that’s a small fraction of the amount of energy consumed by, say, a typical Google datacenter. On average, those use about “200 terawatt hours (TWh) each year.”
What the flying fuck? Imagine having an non-sustaining power system and instead of fixing it or putting more regulations on businesses that waste as much energy as possible they try to ban gaming PCs. pic.twitter.com/d4cUp9Y2bv
— Garuku Bluemoon (@GarukuBluemoon) July 27, 2021
A single data center requires 50 times more energy than all of California’s gamers combined.
According to DataCenters.com, there are currently “197 data centers in California.”
If my math is right — and it is — data centers in California consume roughly 10,000 times more energy than gamers do.
But Google and Apple and Twitter and Facebook can afford pricy Sacramento lobbyists. A gamer streaming on Twich from his basement is a much easier target for feel-good legislators. And since gamers are more likely to be white and male than is average, they make a popular target for California’s progressives.
The gaming PC ban might seem like a trivial issue, but to me it really does exemplify what people call anarcho-tyranny. Many parts of California allow people to steal, defecate in public, use drugs, etc without prosecution. But your life is micromanaged by incompetent morons.
— Aleph (@woke8yearold) July 27, 2021
California has real problems. The state doesn’t produce enough electricity, has underinvested in water infrastructure, refuses to manage its forests properly, rising crime, increasing inequality, decreasing opportunity, and is headed for (assuming it hasn’t already reached) a neofeudal tech-state.
Gaming PCs are so far down the list of California’s that there will probably be a new generation of graphics cards available before we even find it.
But then they’ll ban those, too.
